[Last-Call] Re: [v6ops] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also plus one. This should be standard nit editorial for any draft referring to addresses.

G

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, 6:28 pm Gert Doering, <gert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:44:27PM -0400, Kyle Rose wrote:
> I strongly recommend that in documentation for IPv6 we refer to
> "shorter/longer prefix" where the length of the prefix is the primary
> focus, or to "larger/smaller address block" where the number of addresses
> is the primary focus, and consign "larger/smaller prefix" to the dustbin of
> history. If there were ever a terminology debate worth having, this one is
> it.

This.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
                                           Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux