IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Game theory and IPv4 to IPv6
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: Game theory and IPv4 to IPv6
  • From: peter_blatherwick
• Re: Game theory and IPv4 to IPv6
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on thewayto Prague
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the wayto Prague
  • From: David Harrington
• Game theory and IPv4 to IPv6
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [16NG] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-over-ipv6cs
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: bmanning
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Non-Smoking in Prague
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [16NG] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-over-ipv6cs (IPv6 Over the IP Specific part of the Packet Convergence sublayer in 802.16 Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Alexandru Petrescu
• Re: Already Last-Called downrefs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: EKR
• Vacation
  • From: Nicolas . Williams
• Already Last-Called downrefs (was: ...)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Tom Yu
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Tom Yu
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• RE: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-martin-ibcs (Identity-Based Cryptography Standard (IBCS) #1: Supersingular Curve Implementations of the BF and BB1 Cryptosystems) to Informational RFC
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: Last Call: draft-martin-ibcs (Identity-Based Cryptography Standard (IBCS) #1: Supersingular Curve Implementations of the BF and BB1 Cryptosystems) to Informational RFC
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis (OpenPGP Message Format) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltans-ers (Evidence Record Syntax (ERS)) to Proposed Standard - comment from Tim and answer
  • From: Tobias Gondrom
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-16ng-ipv6-over-ipv6cs (IPv6 Over the IP Specific part of the Packet Convergence sublayer in 802.16 Networks) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Basavaraj Patil
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-martin-ibcs (Identity-Based Cryptography Standard (IBCS) #1: Supersingular Curve Implementations of the BF and BB1 Cryptosystems) to Informational RFC
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Document Action: 'Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)' to Experimental RFC
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Non-Smoking in Prague
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Request for input (patchwork RFCs) (fwd)
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: EKR
• Re: Prague
  • From: Tony Hansen
• RE: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: john . loughney
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Eric A. Hall
• Address consumption vs. routing table growth [was: Re: NATs as firewalls]
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Warning - risk of duty free stuff being confiscated on the way to Prague
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• RE: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: EKR
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Last Call: draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines (Guidance on Area Director Sponsoring of Documents) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: David Morris
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Nick Staff
• Please unsubscribe from this mailing list
  • From: upendra bhanja
• Re: The Devil's in the Deployment RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Russ White
• Re: NATs as firewalls and the NEA
  • From: Jeff Young
• Having more citations or fewer...
  • From: RJ Atkinson
• Re: Prague
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Prague
  • From: Martin Mares
• Re: comments on draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt-09.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Comments on Section 1.2 of draft-ietf-eap-keying-18.txt
  • From: Glen Zorn (gwz)
• Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem (6LoWPAN: Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC]
  • From: Geoff Mulligan
• Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem (6LoWPAN: Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC]
  • From: Geoff Mulligan
• Re: The Devil's in the Deployment RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Russ White
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IETF 70 and 73 Venue Announcement
  • From: John C Klensin
• routing and addressing meetings in Prague
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF 70 and 73 Venue Announcement
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Secretariat RFI Announcement
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Last Call Comments on draft-housley-tls-authz-07
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Tony Hain
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: IETF 70 and 73 Venue Announcement
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: David Morris
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Nick Staff
• Re: IETF 70 and 73 Venue Announcement
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: TCHEPNDA Christian
• Re: FYI: Daylight Savings Time discrepancy
  • From: Lars Eggert
• A little comic relief.... was: RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Thomas Gal
• RE: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF 70 & 73 Venue Locations
  • From: Sam Weiler
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Joe Abley
• RE: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Prague
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Prague
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Prague
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Prague
  • From: Jeff McAdams
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Prague
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• RE: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: Prague
  • From: michael.dillon
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Prague
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Prague
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: Prague
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Prague
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Prague
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Prague
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Prague
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Prague
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Prague
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Prague
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Prague
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• RE: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Dan Harkins
• RE: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: David Morris
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Dan Harkins
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Prague
  • From: Jari Arkko
• DNS role (RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.)
  • From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• RE: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: NATs as firewalls, cryptography, and curbing DDoS threats.
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Tony Hain
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Prague
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Dan Harkins
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IETF 70 and 73 Venue Announcement
  • From: Thierry Ernst
• Re: Prague
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: Prague
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: Prague
  • From: David Harrington
• RE: Prague
  • From: ASH, GERALD R, ATTLABS
• Re: Prague
  • From: Ralph Droms
• SecDir Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: Prague
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Prague
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Prague
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Dan Harkins] comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Prague
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Prague
  • From: Edward Lewis
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: NATs as firewalls
  • From: Eliot Lear
• FYI: Daylight Savings Time discrepancy
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: NATs as firewalls
  • From: michael.dillon
• Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem (6LoWPAN: Overview, Assumptions, Problem Statement and Goals) to Informational RFC]
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: IETF 70 & 73 Venue Locations
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: IETF 70 & 73 Venue Locations
  • From: Fred Baker