IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-ellermann-news-nntp-uri (The 'news' and 'nntp'URI Schemes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action.
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- RE: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Corporate side-effect [Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action]
- Pseudonym side-effects [Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action]
- RE: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Query
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07
- Re: Query
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07
- Re: Last Call: draft-ellermann-news-nntp-uri (The 'news' and 'nntp' URI Schemes) to Proposed Standard
- Query
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Meeting Network Requirements ION Published
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Meeting Network Requirements ION Published
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week)
- RE: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week)
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: amusing text from recently-published US Military standards
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Online blue sheets, was: Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- Usability RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Meeting Network Requirements ION Published
- Re: amusing text from recently-published US Military standards
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: amusing text from recently-published US Military standards
- Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- amusing text from recently-published US Military standards
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- RE: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- RE: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- TLS vs. IPsec (Was: Re: experiments in the ietf week)
- Write an RFC Was: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- RE: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Scheduling unpleasantness
- Re: Scheduling unpleasantness
- RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Scheduling unpleasantness
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: EMSK issue
- Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07
- Re: Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: [HOKEY] EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- Re: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- Re: fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- Re: fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- fyi: Paper: "State of the Internet & Challenges ahead "
- RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07
- Late Last Call comments: draft-ietf-krb-wg-anonymous
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07
- RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- Late Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt
- RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: Last Call: draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0 (EAP Tunneled TLS Authentication Protocol Version 0 (EAP-TTLSv0)) to Informational RFC
- Re: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Who wants old WG archives?
- Re: EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK
- Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"
- Re: EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: IETF Trust minutes?
- Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Objection to Last Call - draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-09.txt
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-05
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-freed-sieve-environment (Sieve Email Filtering: Environment Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: Nomcom liaison duties
- RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Nomcom liaison duties
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-09.txt
- Re: Gen-Art IETF LC review: draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-04.txt
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Last Call: draft-ellermann-news-nntp-uri (The 'news' and 'nntp'URI Schemes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Confirming vs. second-guessing
- Re: Gen-Art IETF LC review: draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-04.txt
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
- Re: On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- On the confidentiality of the information and communication within the nomcom context
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Thoughts on the nomcom process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Gen-Art IETF LC review: draft-ietf-ipfix-testing-04.txt
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- IPv6 experiment: recording lessons, deficiencies and action items
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: experiments in the ietf week
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- experiments in the ietf week
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- EAP applicability (Was: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet)
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- RE: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet
- Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
- Results from the Federated Roaming BBoF
- Re: IPv6 router when switching wifi networks
- From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Sun Glasses Found in Salon I
- Re: Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?
- Re: Last Call: draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry (A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes) to BCP
- IPv6 router when switching wifi networks
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Any further explanation of the Jabber server problems this week?
- Re: Last Call: draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry (A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes) to BCP
- Jabber accounts for the IPv4 outage
- Re: IPv6 only experiment already yielding results
- Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- IPv6 only experiment already yielding results
- Updated KMART BoF Slides have been Upload
- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: Fwd: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?
- Fwd: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Accommodation in Dublin
- BBoF on Federated Roaming: Update
- Looking for a social ticket
- RFC 4693 Experiment Conclusion
- Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- Re: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- Social Event - Transportation / Final Logistics Update
- IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
- RE: Win Ice Hockey Tickets
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- GEOPRIV Experiment at IETF 71
- Re: Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04
- RE: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Jabber Update
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Problem with Jabber Server
- Re: spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?
- Re: Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?
- RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt
- spamarrest.com and mailing list subscriptions
- Re: Design for Deployment (yes you IPv6 wg!) RE: Was it foreseen ..
- Jabber server down? Contact for Jabber server onsite at IETF71?
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- AutoCAD file transfer over WAN
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Design for Deployment (yes you IPv6 wg!) RE: Was it foreseen ..
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Attention to people trying to participate remotely: DST in progress
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Problem with Jabber?
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- RE: AutoCAD file transfer over WAN
- Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Accommodation in Dublin
- Problem with Jabber?
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Audio Streaming has begun - IETF 71 Philadelphia, PA, USA 9-14 March 2008
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: sip call hold
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- sip call hold
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
- Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
- RE: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of trafficfor Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Multicast and charging (Was: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?)
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- Multicast and charging (Was: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?)
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report)
- Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report)
- Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
- Re: IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
- Re: Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Call for participation for possible IRTF Network Virtualization Research Group
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Was it foreseen that the Internet might handle 242 Gbps of traffic for Oprah's Book Club webinars?
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report)
- Win Ice Hockey Club Box Tickets in Philly
- IONs, RFC 4693, Core Process Documents, and BCPs
- a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers
- RE: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-05
- Re: AutoCAD file transfer over WAN
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- A prayer for intercession
- AutoCAD file transfer over WAN
- Sharing information from questionnaires (Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report)
- secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-04.txt
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: IONs & discuss criteria
- IONs & discuss criteria
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
- Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Re: LAST CALL on: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Re: wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Nomcom 2007-8 Chair's Report
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- RE: 71st IETF - Hotels and Social Event
- secdir review of draft-ietf-imapext-sort-19
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- LMI
- wiki for IETF71 IPv6 experience Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP (RUCUS) BOF
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Consensus so far on IDN(A)
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 AlgorithmswithCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- RE: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- IESG Statement on Registration Requests for URIs Containing Telephone Numbers
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- Hasty attempt to create an IDN WG (Was: WG Review: Internationalized Domain Name (idn)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
- Discussion about Federated Roaming
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 Algorithms withCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-sha2 (Using SHA2 Algorithms withCryptographic Message Syntax) to Proposed Standard
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-04.txt
- FW: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis (The TransportLayer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt
- Audio Streaming - IETF 71 Philadelphia, PA, USA 9-14 March 2008
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt
- Missing materials
- Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- IPv6 @ IETF-71, especially Jabber
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt
- RE: 71st IETF - Early Bird Registration Cutoff
- IETF 71 Social Ticket Update - Unpaid Tickets and Waitlist
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF Trust minutes?
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock (tictoc)
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
- Re: IESG Statement on RFC3406 and URN Namespaces Registry Review
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-imapext-sort (INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS) to Proposed Standard
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]