Hi, On Fri, Jun 6, 2025, at 11:58 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Mark, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > [also build test WARNING on next-20250606] > [cannot apply to v6.15] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mark-Pearson/platform-x86-Move-Lenovo-files-into-lenovo-subdir/20250605-013934 > base: linus/master > patch link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604173702.3025074-1-mpearson-lenovo%40squebb.ca > patch subject: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: Move Lenovo files into lenovo > subdir > config: x86_64-randconfig-078-20250606 > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506062319.F0IpDxF6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506062319.F0IpDxF6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > | Closes: > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506062319.F0IpDxF6-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c: In function 'certificate_store': >>> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c:661:47: warning: '%s' directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=] > 661 | return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", arg1, > arg2); > | ^~ > drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c:657:50: warning: '%s' > directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=] > 657 | return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s,%s", > | ^~ > > > vim +661 drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c > > 640a5fa50a42b9 drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2021-11-17 > 652 > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 653 static char *cert_command(struct tlmi_pwd_setting *setting, const > char *arg1, const char *arg2) > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 654 { > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 655 /* Prepend with SVC or SMC if multicert supported */ > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 656 if (tlmi_priv.pwdcfg.core.password_mode >= > TLMI_PWDCFG_MODE_MULTICERT) > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 657 return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s,%s", > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 658 setting == tlmi_priv.pwd_admin ? "SVC" : "SMC", > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 659 arg1, arg2); > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 660 else > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > @661 return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", arg1, arg2); > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 662 } > 5dcb5ef125907d drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c Mark Pearson 2024-10-24 > 663 > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki I'm unable to reproduce this issue with a W=1 build and I think it's a false positive. Am I safe to ignore this report? Mark _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
