Hi, > As you mentioned, this commit was initially intended to fix ML Probe > Response, which is why section 9.4.2.322.2.4 was referenced. Right, makes sense. > However, after reviewing section 35.3.6.4 — which says that the > Per-STA Profile in the ML Reconfiguration Response should be the > same as in the Reassociation Response — I agree that it makes sense > to include the BPCC in this case as well. OK, so I guess we should have a hostapd patch to remove the comment there about not including it. Do you want to do that? > > > > 2) Are you aware of any APs that don't include it, which would mean > > regardless of that, mac80211 should accept both? > > As far as I know, I'm not aware of any APs in the market that don't > include it. OK, cool, so at least we don't have any knowledge of this being necessary. > Maybe people in community can comment on this. If such APs do exist, we > can consider accepting both. I don't know either, and the only reason for now would be to accept it only because of the spec inconsistency, but I guess we can leave it for now. Thanks! johannes _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
