Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> The new location of this section on "--onto" felt a bit off. >> Perhaps it is just me, but in case others have different opinions, >> I'd raise it here. > > I agree that "--onto" is a fairly commonly used option and so it might > be nice to mention it in the general description. That would independently be a good idea. > The existing > examples are all good reasons why one might want to use "--onto" so > I'm slightly wary of replacing them with a single example in the > description. Then perhaps we should find a better place to put it. The section on advanced topics notes are mostly about operations using sequencer machinery, except for the onto section. Perhaps immediately after the apply/merge comparison?
