[PATCH 2/5] describe: error if blob not found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If describe_blob() does not find the blob in question, it returns an
empty strbuf, and we print an empty line. This differs from
describe_commit(), which always either returns an answer or calls die()
itself. As the blob function was bolted onto the command afterwards, I
think its behavior is not intentional, and it is just a bug that it does
not report an error.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
This one is perhaps the most controversial, as it is a change in
behavior. But the current behavior just really seems like a bug to me.

Unlike what René posted earlier, I didn't record the dst strbuf's
original size and compare against that. This is a static function with
only one caller that passes in an empty strbuf, so being overly
defensive didn't seem worth it (arguably these functions should just
return an allocated buffer anyway).

 builtin/describe.c  | 3 +++
 t/t6120-describe.sh | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/builtin/describe.c b/builtin/describe.c
index 383d3e6b9a..06e413d937 100644
--- a/builtin/describe.c
+++ b/builtin/describe.c
@@ -535,6 +535,9 @@ static void describe_blob(const struct object_id *oid, struct strbuf *dst)
 	reset_revision_walk();
 	release_revisions(&revs);
 	strvec_clear(&args);
+
+	if (!dst->len)
+		die(_("blob '%s' not reachable from HEAD"), oid_to_hex(oid));
 }
 
 static void describe(const char *arg, int last_one)
diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
index 256ccaefb7..470631d17d 100755
--- a/t/t6120-describe.sh
+++ b/t/t6120-describe.sh
@@ -409,6 +409,12 @@ test_expect_success 'describe tag object' '
 	test_grep "fatal: test-blob-1 is neither a commit nor blob" actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'describe an unreachable blob' '
+	blob=$(echo not-found-anywhere | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	test_must_fail git describe $blob 2>actual &&
+	test_grep "blob .$blob. not reachable from HEAD" actual
+'
+
 test_expect_success ULIMIT_STACK_SIZE 'name-rev works in a deep repo' '
 	i=1 &&
 	while test $i -lt 8000
-- 
2.51.0.326.gecbb38d78e





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux