Re: [PATCH RFC 11/11] builtin/history: implement "split" subcommand

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 06:37:23PM +0200, Jean-Noël AVILA wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 August 2025 12:56:07 CEST Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > @@ -47,6 +48,26 @@ reorder <revision> (--before=<revision>|--
> after=<revision>)::
> >  	commit. The commits must be related to one another and must be
> >  	reachable from the current `HEAD` commit.
> > 
> > +split <revision> [--message=<message>] [--] [<pathspec>...]::
> 
> missing backticks. Also the order of options and <commit> are different from 
> the general synopsis. Is this order allowed?

It is, but this usage definitely wasn't intended. Will fix.

Patrick




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux