On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 11:05 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/interop/ivec.c b/interop/ivec.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..9bc2258c04ad > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/interop/ivec.c > > Even though this is a shim to somebody else's code, it still is a > part of our codebase, so our CodingGuidelines for C programs should > apply. Sorry, I should have caught these in my preliminary review before he sent this off to the list. One question, though... > > diff --git a/interop/ivec.h b/interop/ivec.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..98be4bbeb54a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/interop/ivec.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > > +#ifndef IVEC_H > > +#define IVEC_H > > + > > +#include "../git-compat-util.h" > > As we use -I. on the command line, there is no need to add "../" > here; just writing > > #include <git-compat-util.h> > > should be enough. Also, if this file does not depend on the > services compat-util header provides (and I do not think it does > from a brief look at its contents), it is better not to include it. Should this rather be #include "git-compat-util.h" with quotes rather than angle brackets? In particular: $ git grep include.*git-compat-util -- '*.[ch]' | wc -l 362 $ git grep include.*git-compat-util -- '*/*.[ch]' | wc -l 125 So, we have 362 includes of git-compat-util.h in our codebase, 125 from subdirectories. Of those: $ git grep include.*git-compat-util -- '*.[ch]' | grep '"' | wc -l 361 $ git grep include.*git-compat-util -- '*.[ch]' | grep '<' | wc -l 1 Only one of these include statements uses angle brackets -- the compiler-tricks/not-constant.c file (which appears to be a temporary hack that we'll eventually delete). I had always assumed <> were for system includes and "" for project includes, but a quick Google search shows the actual situation is quite a bit murkier than I'd realized. Still, our current project practice appears to be double quotes; is that fine here or are you suggesting you'd like the current project practice to be changed?