Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Compared to the first round, this replaces sig_atomic_t by int. I > didn't use bool just in case the patch goes on top of a maintenance > track that does not have the "bool is allowed" policy. That's fair. I happened to have chosen v2.51.0 as the base for v1 during today's integration, but as a fix-up topic, you are correct to point out that I should apply this on top of maint-2.50 or even older. Thanks, will requeue.
