On 8/26/2025 12:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Needs to wait for the base topic to solidify. >>> source: <pull.1941.v2.git.1752716054.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Maybe also mark as expecting a reroll? (cf. >> CABPp-BFzMLGJwz4QqYtvw3zRYgmC=Mb8T8GCOsrLZqT2z+8H7A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and >> CABPp-BHLcy-A4yLR8gP1Sjt_EKQ4K08kPyb7G6yifdZj+0MJNg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > > Good idea. > > As these are primarily to remind me, I'd prefer to point at articles > from the topic author that said "in the next reroll I'll do this" > rather than articles from reviewers when leaving a note to explain > why I do *not* want to merge it yet. But this second round does > look like it needs responses to reviews. Yes, it does need responses to reviews. And I'm looking forward to the base topic getting a reroll before spending too much time on a new version. I'd consider this one blocked at the moment. I reached out to Ayush earlier to see about progress there. Thanks, -Stolee
