Re: [PATCH v2] alloc: fix dangling pointer in alloc_state cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 11:28:32PM +0000, ノウラ | Flare via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: =?UTF-8?q?=E3=83=8E=E3=82=A6=E3=83=A9=20=7C=20Flare?=
>  <nouraellm@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> clear_alloc_state() freed all slabs and nulled the slabs pointer but
> left slab_alloc, nr, and p unchanged. If the alloc_state is reused,
> ALLOC_GROW() can wrongly assume that the slab array is already
> allocated because slab_alloc still holds a stale nonzero capacity.
> In that case s->slabs remains NULL and the next dereference writes
> through a NULL pointer, causing undefined behavior.
This is good.

> 
> To fix this, this patch:
Style nit, we tend to use the "imperative form" here in Git,
like this:

- Rename allocate_alloc_state() → alloc_state_alloc().
- Replace ...
- Update ...
> 
> - Renames allocate_alloc_state() → alloc_state_alloc().
> - Replaces the “just clear” API with
>   alloc_state_free_and_null(struct alloc_state **s_),
>   which frees all slabs and the alloc_state itself,
>   and then nulls the caller’s pointer.
> - Updates call sites to use the new helpers and drops
>   redundant FREE_AND_NULL() calls.
> 
> This makes the alloc_state lifecycle API harder to misuse,
> eliminates stale-capacity state,
> and aligns naming with project conventions.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux