"D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> +Updates one or more branches, tags, or other references in a remote >> +repository from your local repository. > > Considering the glossary entry[1] is for "ref", not "reference", what about > > (a) linking to the glossary (is this possible?), and/or > (b) saying something like > > Updates one or more branches, tags, or other references (called "refs")… > > ? > > [1]: "git help glossary", or > https://git-scm.com/docs/gitglossary#Documentation/gitglossary.txt-ref Both sound good ideas. We should make sure that readers are aware of the glossary by linking into it from more places.
