Re: [PATCH 5/5] midx-write: reenable signed comparison errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The strategy here involves defining the variable within the for loop
> syntax to make sure we use the appropriate bitness for the loop
> sentinel. This matters in at least one method where the variable was
> compared to uint32_t in some loops and size_t in others.

Sounds like a fine way to avoid accidentally breaking these loops.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux