Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
From: Skybuck Flying <skybuck2000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 22:23:23 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <VI1PR02MB42710CA61134BF19214F855AB304A@VI1PR02MB4271.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Msip_labels:
References: <DB7PR02MB4265BF28A39C7BD3DB097E1CB359A@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR02MB4265499C1103242CB482B407B359A@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR02MB4265CDBD131FB755B0799B2FB359A@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR02MB42655790BB6E1EF589B7D173B359A@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR02MB4265DDA928244F526CF1EF4AB359A@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR02MB4265527016FB04A500FBE321B35BA@DB7PR02MB4265.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR02MB42713B3BBD5802512B5FC9FBB33AA@VI1PR02MB4271.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR02MB4271CE7B8F32225C98A2DCBEB33AA@VI1PR02MB4271.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR02MB42710CA61134BF19214F855AB304A@VI1PR02MB4271.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Thread-index: AQHcGR0afBR4UVFtH0y7jlWzQ0OEhLR6DyAsgAM/ILKAAAsx7g==
Thread-topic: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"

GitHub repo created to make it a little bit easier to get the source code and also some win32 binaries:

https://github.com/SkybuckFlying/Skybuck-s-Gitflow

It also contains some Skybuck's Gitflow v4 text and same text in README.md updated to use git-command-etc.exe so AI can understand it better.

Bye for now,
  Skybuck.

References:
- [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
  - From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
  - From: Skybuck Flying

Prev by Date: Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
Next by Date: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2025, #12; Fri, 29)
Previous by thread: Re: Was "Re: [RFC] Proposed Git Workflow for Permanent History, Explicit Branch Status, and Developer Continuity" now "Skybuck's GitFlow"
Next by thread: Re: git-phoenix - repository recovery tool
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]