On 8/25/25 9:34 AM, Jeff King wrote: > > [oidset instead of khash] > But the bonus here is that we didn't need to define a new hash > type, nor do any tricks with the commit->index field. It took me a while to notice what's tricky, or rather inconsistent, about the khash set of commit objects with commit index as hash: We could just as well go all in and use an uint32_t khash set of commit indexes. That would reduce the memory footprint further. No pointers needed here. Didn't measure a meaningful performance difference though, so that's that.. René
