Jesse Hathaway <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Git developers, > > Thanks for the wonderful tool. I still use `git whatchanged` I realize > that `git log --raw` is the same output, but it doesn't have the same > mnemonic resonance as `git whatchanged`. The "raw" output spews meaningless hexadecimal strings. Why not learn to use a more meaningful option, now you are switching out of the command that is going away anyway, perhaps like "--status", which lets you see the extent of damage to each path, for example?