> Not just you repeat having bulleted list in your proposed log > messages (which I already said something about, remember?), now you > have them in your cover letter, too? You must be so fond of > bulletted list X-<. It's true, I do really love bulleted lists. I see now that I misunderstood your previous comment about this: I'll avoid using bulleted lists in commit messages and emails in the future. >> ++ Switch to _<branch>_. This sets the current branch to _<branch>_ and >> ++ updates the files in your working directory. Files which are >> ++ identical in _<branch>_ and your current commit are left unchanged >> ++ so that you can keep your uncommitted changes to those files. > > Here "left unchanged" is technically correct, but somehow it gives > me a (n incorrect) connotation that they are not modified since > HEAD, which is not what you wanted to say at all. I recall that we > once explained this not as "left unchanged", but as "changes follow > you", and I found the explanation easier to absorb. I like the idea of "changes follow you". Will work on making this clearer. > OK. Do people understand "making a(ny) changes" refers to creation > of the new branch, I have to wonder, but if so, the above is much > much nicer than the original text. > > This fails without doing anything and without creating a new > branch, if checking out the <start-point> has to overwrite your > uncommitted changes. > > might be slightly better? I dunno. Makes sense. I'll be more explicit.