Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] xdiff: introduce rust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> If we cannot find anything, an alternative could also be to take a very
> simple subsystem that doesn't see a lot of changes and convert that to
> Rust. We'd retain both implementations in that case, which I mentioned
> is painful because we now have to keep both in sync. But if we say that
> this is a testballoon, only, and that we don't continue to convert other
> code until Git 3.0, then that might be fine.
>
> "varint.c" could be a good match. It's trivial, only 30 lines of code,
> and completely standalone.

I am afraid that it is a bit too trivial.  I didn't mention this
possibility of maintaining parallel implementations, but the
quiescent area I had in mind was patch-delta.c (no, I am not that
ambitious to suggest diff-delta.c as the first example).

> We could still build new and optional functionality via Rust, but I
> guess it also doesn't hurt to have a test balloon that is part of
> libgit.a to test interoperability.

OK.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux