On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:00:29PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > I may end up asking for some assistance in polishing and sending in what > I have. Most of what I have is reasonably good quality[0] and should be > bisectable, but I'm up to 81 patches before the Rust part of the code > (which so far has 12 patches) and I'm worried I won't be able to both > write it and get it sent in in nice-sized series before 3.0 is likely to > happen. Oh, I didn't expect it to be that much work. In any case, I would be happy to help out with this effort in case there's anything concrete we can do here. > Alternatively, we could maybe accept that interoperability is a > nice-to-have for Git 3.0 and not an essential. It's not mentioned in > the BreakingChanges document, so it's perhaps not a requirement. We > could also have someone work on this as part of their job to get it > handled more quickly[1]. I wouldn't mind that outcome, either. > Finally, I am currently interested in working on the interop code (but > have no problem handing it off if that works better for the project), > but I cannot guarantee that I will absolutely have time or inclination > to continue. That is very fair indeed. I don't have the intention to force anybody's hands with the proposed 3.0 timeline. Patrick
