> The suggestion you cite has relevance only as long as deduplication is > the chosen implementation scheme, however, Phillip is arguing that the > deduplication and key reordering logic should be dropped, hence, the > cited reference isn't relevant in light of Phillip's suggestion. Ok! > However, Phillip has presented a good reason to prefer > "output in order requested, no deduplication", and I do find his > argument compelling. I'll do that! Thanks!
