"D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> git rev-list --count --left-only @{u}...
> git rev-list --count ..@{u}
>
> In my estimation, since we're not using --cherry-pick here, the first
> says "list (count) the commits on upstream but not in HEAD, since the
> merge-base (which is reachable from both)" while the second says "list
> (count) the commits on upstream but not in HEAD." Is there ever a
> situation where those sets aren't the same?
I don't think of any; let us know when you find a case that the
above does not hold true ;-).
