On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 9:15 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Greg > > On 11/08/2025 12:55, Greg Hurrell via GitGitGadget wrote: > > From: Greg Hurrell <greg.hurrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > 1. For file "foo", Git will emit "foo". > > 2. For file "foo bar", Git will emit "foo bar\t". > > 3. For file "foo\t", Git will emit "\"foo\t\"". > > 4. For file "foo bar\t", Git will emit "\"foo bar\t\"". > > > > Before this commit, `git-jump` correctly handled only case "1". > > > > After this commit, `git-jump` correctly handles cases "1" and "2". In > > reality, these are the only cases people are going to run into with any > > regularity, and the other two are rare edge cases, which probably aren't > > worth the effort to support unless somebody actually complains about > > them. > > Thanks for updating the commit message, I agree it's probably not worth > worrying about cases 3 & 4 unless someone complains > > Thanks > > Phillip Agreed, and fine by me (since we have a strict improvement).
