opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ... there fundamentally is something wrong here. > > Thank you for the thorough response and for explaining the > reasoning / implementation of the more correct patch. > >> Would something more direct like the attached patch work? > > I am not familiar with the inner workings of Git at all, but I > cannot think of any problem with this approach. This works for me! Ah, what I meant was that I did not test the patch, so I did not know if it solves the problem you observed in your environment and with your development tools, hence I was asking you to apply it and test, like you did when you originally noticed the problem ;-) Thanks.
