Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > So with that knowledge I'd rather do the safe thing and abort the > transaction. It requires less hard-to-test logic and feels safer > overall. > > If we agree on that I can send a final reroll that reverts back to the > logic we had in v3, which did abort the transaction. I guess both you and Peff also prefer code that is more maintainable and easier to reason about, and I am with you two, so let's go back to the approach of v3. Thanks.
