Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 10:09:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Toon Claes <toon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >>> +-t:: >> >> >> >> -t, --tree-in-recursive:: >> > >> > Sure! >> >> Clarify *what* you do to trees in recursive by giving a verb, e.g. >> >> --show-trees-in-recursive > > Ah, that's even better indeed! One question that this raises is whether > this option then should continue to imply `--recursive`. I think it > rather shouldn't with this new wording, but don't feel overly strong > about it. I am somewhat indifferent. We can call the option --show-trees, which I suspect would make it more consistent with ls-trees, while making it a bit more confusing at the same time. I dunno.
