Re: Feature Request: git mv --after (new flag)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 4, 2025, at 17:53, FMorschel wrote:
> Wow, this seems to me a really weird design choice.
>
> Do you have any insight on to why is this?

https://lore.kernel.org/git/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504150753440.7211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

> And do you have any idea if this behaviour is tracked to change 
> somewhere? Maybe by project config? Like, one project could opt-in for 
> an actual "rename" history.

As a bystander: I’ve never seen anyone involved in this project
wanting to track renames as part of the commit.

PS: You need to keep the CC intact when replying on this list. :)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux