kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 6e411d20440 (Initial draft of fast-import documentation., 2007-02-05) > pointed out how much time a fast-import took on some hardware with a > specific cost. Let’s further point out that this experiment was done > in 2007. So modern hardware should have no issues with such a repo. > > Also move the parenthetical to the end now that it contains four words. > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/git-fast-import.adoc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-fast-import.adoc b/Documentation/git-fast-import.adoc > index d2327842003..6f9763c11b3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-fast-import.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/git-fast-import.adoc > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ amount of memory usage and processing time. Assuming the frontend > is able to keep up with fast-import and feed it a constant stream of data, > import times for projects holding 10+ years of history and containing > 100,000+ individual commits are generally completed in just 1-2 > -hours on quite modest (~$2,000 USD) hardware. > +hours on quite modest hardware (~$2,000 USD in 2007). That is a definite improvement. Thanks.