Re: [PATCH 9/9] sub-process: do not use strbuf_split*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 9:44 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The code to read status from subprocess reads one packet line and
> tries to find "status=<foo>".  It is way overkill to split the line
> into an array of two strbufs to extract <foo>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sub-process.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sub-process.c b/sub-process.c
> index 1daf5a9752..de3235c15a 100644
> --- a/sub-process.c
> +++ b/sub-process.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  #include "sub-process.h"
>  #include "sigchain.h"
>  #include "pkt-line.h"
> +#include "string-list.h"

Is this needed? It looks like skip_prefix() (not any string_list
function) is used instead of strbuf_split_str().

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux