On Tue, Jul 29, 2025, at 02:25, Ben Knoble wrote: >> ... >> Will show one entry since `branch` is the one-level ref `branch`, not >> `refs/heads/branch`. Now it looks like `write` truncated the reflog and >> wrote a new reflog message (if you mistakenly think that `branch` is a >> branch). > > This quirk of update-ref bit me the first few times I used it, too. I > think it’s at least documented there though. I do that with update-ref more than I care to commit^W admit. But that’s consistent with the command and well-documented.
