Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdiff: optimize xdl_hash_record_verbatim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Jul 2025, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Compiler reassociation barrier: pretend to modify X and Y to disallow
> > + * changing evaluation order with respect to following uses of X and Y.
> > + */
> > +#ifdef __GNUC__
> > +#define REASSOC_FENCE(x, y) asm("" : "+r"(x), "+r"(y))
> > +#else
> > +#define REASSOC_FENCE(x, y)
> > +#endif
> 
> With gcc we can build, but with clang, we unfortunately get this:
> 
>     $ make CC=clang DEVELOPER=YesPlease
>     xdiff/xutils.c:330:4: error: extension used [-Werror,-Wlanguage-extension-token]
>       330 |                         REASSOC_FENCE(c0, ha);
>           |                         ^
>     xdiff/xutils.c:302:29: note: expanded from macro 'REASSOC_FENCE'
>       302 | #define REASSOC_FENCE(x, y) asm("" : "+r"(x), "+r"(y))
>           |                             ^

Sorry, wasn't aware that Clang would warn. The solution is to spell 'asm' with
double underscores, __asm__.  I'll make this change if I post a v2.

Thanks.
Alexander




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux