Re: A Question from a Hopeful Future Contributor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 7:16 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Eric Frederickson <ericfrederickson68@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Looking through the repo for a place to find todo items, I naturally stumbled
> > upon the TODO file in the origin/todo branch,...
>
> Please disregard that file (I should remove it from the repository,
> too).  It is not curated at all, and the last update to it is more
> than 13 years ago.
>
> >> * "git status" on intent-to-add index entries (say "I" in the first
> >>   column instead of "A" for short status, add "(needs 'git add')" at the
> >>   end of "new file: $path " in long status).
> >
> > I am interpreting this todo message as meaning that the following behavior
> > should be implemented:
>
> I think that was done long time ago.  The entry may have been a wish-item
> in April 2011, but not anymore.

At least in 2.48.1 and in git version 2.50.0.rc0.48.g74dbe4346c, this
behavior isn't present. So I wouldn't call it "done"—maybe there was a
discussion that it shouldn't be done, though? I didn't search the
list.

>
> Sorry for wasting your time.  A better sources of inspiration might
> come from list archive searches for the past 3 year or so.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=%22%23leftoverbit%22+d%3A20220718..
>
> But even then, many itches have already been scratched.
>
> As is often said, in open source, the easiest is to start scratching
> your own itch ;-)
>
> Thanks.
>


-- 
D. Ben Knoble





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux