Cameron Steffen <cam.steffen94@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sometimes I run into a conflict in a rebase and I end up resolving the > conflict by removing all the changes. Then when I run `git rebase > --continue`, the current commit is skipped and the rebase continues > normally. Would it be possible to emit a message showing that the > commit was skipped in this case? It isn't very obvious to me in my > workflow that that is what occurred. I do not know what level of verbosity is needed to grab attention by the end user, but something like this might be a good starting point? Totally untested, and there may be implications (like, control passes this point in different situations where the messages is not warranted). I'll pick a few people from git shortlog --since=2.years --no-merges sequencer.c based on their contribution to the file (not counting the internal implementation changes) and Cc them to see if they have ideas. Thanks. sequencer.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git c/sequencer.c w/sequencer.c index 67e4310edc..677d6105dd 100644 --- c/sequencer.c +++ w/sequencer.c @@ -5369,6 +5369,8 @@ static int commit_staged_changes(struct repository *r, goto out; } + warning(_("omitting a step that has become empty")); + if (!final_fixup) { ret = 0; goto out;