Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] C99: declare bool experiment a success

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Karthik
>
> On 16/07/2025 11:29, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> We've had a test balloon for C99's bool type since 8277dbe987
>>> (git-compat-util: convert skip_{prefix,suffix}{,_mem} to bool,
>>> 2023-12-16). As it has been over 18 months since this was added and
>>> there have been no complaints let's declare it a success and convert
>>> the return type our other string predicates to match.
>>>
>>
>> Neat, I didn't even know we were running such an experiment. Thanks for
>> getting around to it, I think the patches look great, added some
>> complaints from 'clang-format', feel free to ignore.
>
> Thanks for taking a look. I would have fixed the formatting but this is
> in next already so I'll leave it as it is if that's ok with you.
>

Of course :) These are small nits. I'm mostly interested in getting
clang-format to work without any/many false positives, so I'm trying to
test it with different patches that I read and report back!

> Thanks
>
> Phillip

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux