I'm aware of the many discussions about precious files [1] [2] [3], but I wanted to highlight a particularly pernicious category of precious files that are really hard to do the right thing about with Git: namely, other version control systems. In particular, as I learned in [4], `git clean -ixd` will of course list `.jj` to delete and delete it if you have it in gitignore. But yet having it untracked results in it possibly accidentally getting added and also clutters up `git status`. It's my understanding that git has more file deletion edge cases of gitignored files than of untracked ones so the latter is theoretically safer. Is that correct? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1627.git.1703643931314.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/871s7r4wuv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/7v4oepaup7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [4]: https://maddie.wtf/posts/2025-07-21-jujutsu-for-busy-devs The part about these that is especially pernicious is that git does the right thing to `.git`, there are not that many of *these* particular file patterns, and they generally merit the same treatment as .git as deleting them results in somewhere between frustrating and catastrophic loss of work. The one other example of one I've seen other than .jj is .sl, though that's only colocated with git if you are up to serious shimming shenanigans with broken tools (nix flakes etc) as AFAIK it is not supposed to be used colocated normally. Should these be special cased somehow? Should they be simply caught by the precious-files work when it eventually gets done? Regards, Jade