Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... by 15%. Just over half of that seems to come from hoisting the > check for whitespace flags in xdl_hash_record() out of the loop > in xdl_prepare_ctx() and the rest comes from the change in hash > function. The first half of that alone is interesting enough ;-). > As I understand it the hash is implemented using SIMD > compiler intrinsics and the rust implementation is basically a > copy of the C code in libxxhash. I wonder how well xxhash performs > compared to our existing hash on platforms without an optimized > implementation. Yeah, that indeed is worth investigating. Thanks.
