On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 09:49:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes: > > > the obvious followup idea would then be "meta", but that suggests > > > that > > > it isn't only a read-only command, which i think it is supposed to > > > remain? > > > > "git repository query" > > "git repository stat" > > ...? > > > yes, but one could also add "git repository set" or some such. as such > symmetry is reasonable to expect, people might be confused by its absence. > an obviously read-only command like "query" would preclude this. Well, right now it's exclusively read-only, true. But that doesn't mean that there will never be a use case for adding a writing subcommand to it. Patrick
