Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 6:20 PM Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> diff --git a/refs/refs-internal.h b/refs/refs-internal.h >> index 03f5df04d5..90de7837f8 100644 >> --- a/refs/refs-internal.h >> +++ b/refs/refs-internal.h >> @@ -353,11 +353,12 @@ void base_ref_iterator_init(struct ref_iterator *iter, >> typedef int ref_iterator_advance_fn(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator); >> >> /* >> - * Seek the iterator to the first reference matching the given prefix. Should >> - * behave the same as if a new iterator was created with the same prefix. >> + * Seek the iterator to the first matching reference. If set_prefix is set, > > s/If set_prefix is set/If the REF_ITERATOR_SEEK_SET_PREFIX flag is set/ > Will change, thanks. >> + * it would behave the same as if a new iterator was created with the same >> + * prefix. > > Maybe: s/with the same prefix/at the same reference/ > Changed it to If the REF_ITERATOR_SEEK_SET_PREFIX flag is set, it would behave the same as if a new iterator was created with the provided refname as prefix. >> */ >> typedef int ref_iterator_seek_fn(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator, >> - const char *prefix); >> + const char *refname, unsigned int flags);
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature