Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Jul 11 2025, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I think that is correct; I do not think gpg.program is to give a >> path to the program, so comparison with core.excludesfile is >> probably not so appropriate. >> >> It gives a command line, e.g. "mysign --compat=gnupg", > > gpg-interface does not use the shell to run gpg.program, so this won't > work. You're right. Thanks for correcting me. I should have gone to the code I wrote instead of answering from what I didn't see (namely, the word "pathname") in the documentation X-<.
