Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I don't want to implement language tag parsing here since we don't need >> to do that. I would like to do the simple thing to prevent commonly >> used locales that don't represent actual language tags from being >> included and not overengineer this design > > I think that your design of filtering C and POSIX accomplishes that, > even if it might seem like hardcoding those two values is a little dirty. Thanks for correcting me regarding language tag length Carlo. I guess I am fine with filtering out "C" and "POSIX" now. Not perfect, but I think everyone agrees that we don't want to maintain a database of language tags just for this. Collin
