Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
From: "Russell Hanneken" <rhanneken@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 19:39:47 -0400
Cc: <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Feedback-id: i0f414978:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <xmqqikk3xog6.fsf@gitster.g>
References: <20250708024507.62386-1-rhanneken@pobox.com> <20250708024507.62386-2-rhanneken@pobox.com> <xmqqikk3xog6.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 1:05 AM EDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Will queue.  Thanks.

Was there something wrong with my patch? I haven't seen my change appear
in the repository.

Regards,

Russell Hanneken
rhanneken@xxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
  - From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk

References:
- [PATCH 0/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
  - From: Russell Hanneken
- [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
  - From: Russell Hanneken
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Filter C and POSIX out of Accept-Language
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/8] packfile: refactor `get_multi_pack_index()` to work on sources
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct doc for glob pathspec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux