On 10/07/2025 22:12, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> >> How would you like to proceed? (yes, I haven't written the commit message >> yet). > > ... appears near the end of the message, and the way _I_ would like > to proceed is to make sure two parties involved in overlapping > solutions to the same problem talk to each other and come up with a > solution together. The first step to get you going would be to CC > the other parties involved. Oops, I had intended to cc Patrick! :( > If the controversial step in Patrick's 8-patch series is relatively > independent from others (which was the impression I got from "more > or less random cleanups and improvements"), one approach with less > friction is to simply omit it and make it 7-patch series. While you > and Patric work out what the best approach to solve the libexecdir > problem, the rest of the series can proceed without waiting, > hopefully? Yep, that would be my preferred route. Having said that, Patrick's patch does remove the regression, so we could keep them separate if that is preferred. I don't mind either way. :) Thanks! ATB, Ramsay Jones
