Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > "python" may be a symlink to python 2.x, or 3.x, or not exist at all. I > am not aware of *any* scenario where a distributor has re-packaged > Python, "python" exists on PATH and is a real Python 3.x interpreter, > but "python3" doesn't exist. > > I am not aware of this ever being an existing real world scenario in the > past, either -- it is not a "we no longer live in the bad old days" > scenario. Good. Thanks.
