Am 09.07.25 um 12:41 schrieb Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón: > CC: Johannes Sixt on feedback for SIGCHLD in mingw which uses 17 instead > of 22 (cygwin and others) and therefore seem to cause signal to err > without setting errno as it should. I don't know what the relevance of the actual number of a signal is. Nobody is supposed to use the number, only the macro. But I may be misjudging the situation as a bystander of this discussion. Furthermore, there is no such thing as "a signal" on Windows (outside of Cygwin), let alone a SIGCHLD. Therefore, this topic about SA_RESTART is irrelevant for the MinGW port. That said, we have a very stupid emulation of SIGALRM, but it doesn't work like a POSIX signal in any way (if it works at all). -- Hannes
