Re: [PATCH v4] fast-(import|export): improve on commit signature output format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> And I totally agree with you that reviews often deserve very well
>> reasoned responses, which take time to prepare; a response that
>> comes as spinal reflex without much thought is often not very
>> useful.
>>
>> It really depends on the definition of "fast" in "fast response".
>>
>> If we need a week to come up with a newer iteration,
>
> The issue is that whatever the time we could set as a norm, like "a
> week" here or 2 or 3 days, or one month, or whatever,

Yeah, topic sizes varies.

Historically, summer is a slower season and these messages I sent
are primarily for me to keep track of topics on flight.  "I am on
vacation for a few more weeks so expect response time longer than
usual" would have been a perfectly fine response.

Not even acknowledging receipt of review comments was what I
primarily saw as a communication gap.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux