On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:13:07AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > 2. Possibly "stash store" could pull the default message from the > > commit, rather than using the generic one. > > This might be a good compromise. Even we discourage the use of > "store" and "create" combo to interactive users, we do care about > ergonomics for script writers. > > Those who use "create" to write a detailed log message (which may > later be reused for a real commit that is created out of the stashed > changes) would end up with a huge and unpleasant stash entries if > they use "store" without any message, which may be a negative > experinece for them, though. I'd feel a bit better about tweaking the ergonomics of "stash store" if I thought it was generally useful to script writers. But it appears to have been created solely as an implementation detail of rebase.autostash, and I do not recall ever hearing of anybody using it in the 12 years since. I.e., without understanding why somebody would want to use it in the first place, I don't know what potential we have to disrupt them by switching the behavior (and nor am I all that excited to spend time working on it. ;) ). Maybe José can tell us a bit more about his use case. -Peff
