Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 05:34:26 +0200
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>, Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx>, Justin Tobler <jltobler@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqzfdf1ve9.fsf@gitster.g>
References: <20250611134506.2975856-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20250625125055.1375596-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <xmqqzfdf1ve9.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 12:35 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The topic saw only a few comments in this last iteration.  Would we
> be seeing a hopefully small and final update to tie the loose ends
> before we declare that the topic is ready for 'next'?

Yeah, I am planning to work on a small update soon.

Thanks.

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
  - From: Christian Couder
- [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
  - From: Christian Couder
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] read-cache: report lock error when refreshing index
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4] fast-(import|export): improve on commit signature output format
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
Next by thread: [PATCH v6 0/5] Make the "promisor-remote" capability support more fields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]