Re: [PATCH v2] daemon: correctly handle soft accept() errors in service_loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/06/2025 00:53, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

That seems unnecessarily restrictive just to minimize churn and leaves the
deflaration of incoming strangely sitting in between two assignments, which
while it doesn't trigger -Wdeclaration-after-statement seems to go against
its spirit.

Hmph, I am not Phillip, but my take on it is that incoming and retry
are fairly closely related variables in this loop, and better
grouped together?

That was my thinking too

Thanks

Phillip




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux