When inserting an existing element, "add_entry" would convert "index"
value to "-1-index" to indicate the caller that this element is in the
list already. However, in "string_list_insert", we would simply convert
this to the original positive index without any further action.
In 8fd2cb4069 (Extract helper bits from c-merge-recursive work,
2006-07-25), we create "path-list.c" and then introduce above code path.
Let's directly return the index as we don't care about whether the
element is in the list by using "add_entry". In the future, if we want
to let "add_entry" tell the caller, we may add "int *exact_match"
parameter to "add_entry" instead of converting the index to negative to
indicate.
Signed-off-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@xxxxxxxxx>
---
string-list.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/string-list.c b/string-list.c
index 8540c29bc9..171cef5dbb 100644
--- a/string-list.c
+++ b/string-list.c
@@ -40,14 +40,13 @@ static int get_entry_index(const struct string_list *list, const char *string,
return right;
}
-/* returns -1-index if already exists */
static int add_entry(struct string_list *list, const char *string)
{
int exact_match = 0;
int index = get_entry_index(list, string, &exact_match);
if (exact_match)
- return -1 - index;
+ return index;
ALLOC_GROW(list->items, list->nr+1, list->alloc);
if (index < list->nr)
@@ -65,9 +64,6 @@ struct string_list_item *string_list_insert(struct string_list *list, const char
{
int index = add_entry(list, string);
- if (index < 0)
- index = -1 - index;
-
return list->items + index;
}
--
2.50.0
