Re: [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lidong Yan <502024330056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I assume that t4216/test_bloom_filters_used has already verified that
> using bloom filters with multiple pathspec elements produces the same
> results as when bloom filters are not used. But I would love to add more
> test cases to check no false negative happened.

If we are sure we have enough test coverage, then it is great. If
not, it is superb if you can add some test coverage there.

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux